|
hrgiger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes it is.
707umair (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
umm just look at the fucking facts its obvious
707umair (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
obviously not half the damn country knows the truth. they didn't do a good job covering up anything
jolonui (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Stonegroove90 is correct. I too was watching this live on BBC. It is not faked or edited. The original recorded tapes went missing after this broadcast on the day and were only found last year apparantly misfiled in the 2007 section??? how???
jdavis8 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
IT'S DE-BRIS NOT DEB-RIS!
british...
getgrowingnow (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
why does everyone just accept the fact that nothing is being accomplished?
getgrowingnow (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There is too much energy and discussion still being put into this and other related events. Its evident that there is an absurd amount of unanswered questions yet we still talk. & years.
hrgiger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You have a valid question, but sadly anything negating conspiracy or anti-Bush sentiment is greeted with cries of 'What a dumbass!' or 'You are brainwashed!'. See also - 'You are part of the Conspiracy!'. This is according those who know the 'truth' (ergo everything is a conspiracy). Logic dictates that not every single tiny detail of 911 can be a conspiracy, but nothing will sway these folks, which it is arguably disturbing in some cases. I try to be objective about it but I'm not popular.
eyepatchinc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i wasnt questioning weather or not SHE was broadcasting live, i was questioning weather or not the footage in the background was live & if she was even IN new york. my point is: this just seems like TOO big of a misstep by the people who carried out the 9/11 coverup. i would think they'd be smarter than this - to announce something before it happens
stonegroove90 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
make that white letters ;)
red backround |
