|
GuruSwamiG (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Namaste ---- a Sat Guru gives over and above any oneness
deeksha modality......
maha shanti om
zacquaviva (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thank you for your insight into your experience. The service you provide is great.
I am a Oneness Deeksha giver, and my understanding is it is different than Shaktipat in the fact that it is not required for the Blessing giver to be awakened. The Blessing does in fact have three aspects 1-the intention of the recipient 2-the intention of the giver 3-the intention of the divine. It has divine intelligence that allows for it to perform whatever function needed, may it be kundalini awakening or
intelite (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
omg thanks for clearing up so many thimgs!
SadashivJ (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This video has made absolutely clear the need for a Sat-Guru (as Swami-G is) when kundalini is active. I was one who got caught up in the phenomenon of 'instant knowing' and thought I had reached realization. At that point I thought I did not need anybody for anything as what more could be needed. For quite awhile things were estatic, then came the doubts of ones own realization, followed by an acute awareness of suffering. Grace moved me to return so SG recently and I am most grateful.
jayant77in (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
so so.....
GuruSwamiG (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Namaste - of course there are different methodologies and
as i like to say bringing different scenery along the way, but the end point is 0-ne. Different routes but same destination no matter what the language - practices etc. Love & Light
GuruSwamiG (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Namaste - yes one sees through mind and it's nature but there is yet much further to go. There are many shifts along the way and same way as accessing a bliss state which there is the feeling of being one with God and this also is not it. It still contains a *me* that is being one with something other.
Love & Light nice dialogs
OzayRinpoche (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the mind realiseation Ozay speaks of is not just stilling mind, it is the realiseation of the nature of mind, but there is further to go, this distinction Ozay not let go of, till everyone recognises there is further to go otherwise this common error in beleiving there is no further to go many will not move beyound.
much love precious one.
OzayRinpoche (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
(1)Thanks again Swamigji, yes different methodologies is correct, your questioner (Ron?) has to realise though different methodologies, all are going to the same place with different starting points. Further onto realiseation,
GuruSwamiG (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Part 2 Here it is only Realization when the *me* has dissolved into IS - and simply the
ever present Reality remains.
There is no confusion here and it still stands that 4 have entered into the totality of enlightenment as you like to say.
Perhaps we just have different methodolgies. Love & Light |
